New Times, Inc. v. Wamstad

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a reporter may rely on statements by a single source even though they reflect only one side of the story without showing a reckless disregard for the truth
• stating that a reporter may rely on statements by a single source even though they reflect only one side of the story without showing a reckless disregard for the truth
• stating that because the plaintiff and a judge disagreed with a source’s characterization of a statement is not evidence that the media defendant reiterating the statement acted with actual malice
• stating that because the plaintiff and a judge disagreed with a source’s characterization of a statement is not evidence that the media defendant reiterating the statement acted with actual malice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).