New Paradigm Software Corp. v. New Era of Networks, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing rescission claim because “Plaintiff has asserted no reason why damages would not be an adequate remedy”
• where plaintiff alleged interference with contract occurred prior to defendant’s stock purchase, the court declined to dismiss tortious interference claim
• “Plaintiff’s tortious interference claim is principally addressed to NEON’s interference with the 1997 contract between VIE and New Paradigm prior to NEON’s actual purchase of VIE’s stock.”
• \[T]here can be no liability for tortiously interfering with one's own contract ....\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).