New London v. Speer
Citations
- 227 Conn. App. 221
Syllabus
The plaintiff, the city of New London, sought to recover a balance due for water and sewer services provided to the defendant's property. The defendant filed a counterclaim alleging that she was a debtor in a pending bankruptcy action at the time the underlying action was commenced, and sought damages for the plaintiff's alleged violation of the automatic stay imposed by the United States Bankruptcy Code (11 U.S.C. § 362). The trial court granted the plaintiff's motion to dismiss the counterclaim, finding that it did not have subject matter jurisdiction to hear the action. On the defendant's appeal to this court, held that the trial court improp- erly dismissed the defendant's counterclaim for lack of subject matter jurisdiction: considering the express statutory language in 11 U.S.C. § 362 (k) creating a right to damages for individuals injured by violations of the automatic stay, and consistent with federal precedent construing the same, 11 U.S.C. § 362 (k) authorized an independent cause of action for damages that survived the disposition of the underlying bankruptcy case; moreover, this court concluded, consistent with the majority of federal appellate courts, that the plain language of the federal statute (28 U.S.C. § 1334) governing bankruptcy cases and proceedings grants federal district courts original and exclusive jurisdiction over the bank- ruptcy petition only, and that a claim for damages pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362 (k) was not a bankruptcy petition and did not fall under the exclusive jurisdiction of the federal district courts; furthermore, the clear statutory language in 28 U.S.C. § 1334 (b) distinguishing between the exclusive and ''not exclusive'' jurisdiction of the federal district courts reinforced the presumption of concurrent state court jurisdiction over the federal claim for damages pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362 (k) and compelled the conclusion that an action for damages pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362 (k) is a civil proceeding arising under title
Judges: Bright; Elgo; Sheldon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Stern v. MarshallSupreme Court· 2011-06-23· cited 2,206×
- Howlett Ex Rel. Howlett v. RoseSupreme Court· 1990-06-11· cited 1,197×
- Tafflin v. LevittSupreme Court· 1990-03-19· cited 634×
- Diana Houck v. Substitute Trustee ServicesFourth Circuit· 2015-07-01· cited 603×
- In Re Crysen/montenay Energy Co., Debtor. Crysen/montenay Energy Co. v. Esselen Associates, Inc.Second Circuit· 1990-05-09· cited 230×
- Executive Benefits Insurance Agency v. ArkisonSupreme Court· 2014-06-09· cited 221×
- George P. Stoe v. William E. Flaherty David Carpenter James Carpenter William Smelas Robert Sunderman Ronald StatileThird Circuit· 2006-01-23· cited 166×
- Richard Gonzales, Juliana Gonzales and Michael Dodge v. Barbara Parks and Jerome ParksNinth Circuit· 1987-10-20· cited 162×
- Richard D. Price, Jr., Formerly Doing Business as Richard D. Price, Jr. & Associates, Limited v. James M. Rochford, Kirk A. Holman, Jack C. VieleySeventh Circuit· 1991-11-08· cited 139×
- Mbna America Bank, N.A. v. Kathleen A. HillSecond Circuit· 2006-01-25· cited 139×
- Coskery v. BerryhillFirst Circuit· 2018-06-04· cited 115×
- Atlantic Richfield Co. v. ChristianSupreme Court· 2020-04-20· cited 93×
- Martin-Trigona v. Champion Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nSeventh Circuit· 1989-12-26· cited 67×
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. LabuzanFifth Circuit· 2009-08-18· cited 60×
- City of West Haven v. Hartford InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-02-11· cited 59×
- Soto v. Bushmaster Firearms International, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2019-03-19· cited 58×
- Quincy Medical Center v. GuptaFirst Circuit· 2017-06-02· cited 50×
- MOAC Mall Holdings LLC v. Transform Holdco LLCSupreme Court· 2023-04-19· cited 49×
- 366-388 Geary Street, L.P. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1990-04-26· cited 37×
- Sullins v. RodriguezSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2007-01-30· cited 25×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.