New Jersey Turnpike Authority v. American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that agency interpretation that is contrary to statutory language, or undermines legislative intent, is entitled to no deference
• noting that interpreta tion of agency charged with enforcing statute is entitled to “substantial deference” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• noting that agency interpretation that is contrary to statutory language, or undermines legislative intent, is entitled to no deference
• noting that interpretation of agency charged with enforcing statute is entitled to \substantial deference\
• noting that interpretation of agency charged with enforcing statute is entitled to “substantial deference”
• stating well-settled principle that no deference shall be given to agency interpretation of statute that is contrary to statutory language or legislative intent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).