New Jersey Transit Corp. v. Harsco Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiff Tn light of this recommendation, the court does not address GM’s unmerchantability, timeliness, and privity arguments with respect to Plaintiffs’ implied warranty claims. (See D.I. 32 at 30-32
• holding implied warranty of merchantability is “displaced” after expiration of express warranty
• dismissing breach of implied warranty of merchantability claim where damage arose after the express warranty had expired
• under New Jersey law, an implied warranty of merchantability “simply means that the thing sold is reasonably fit for the general purpose for which it is manufactured and sold.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).