Skip to main content
· 1/2/1974

New Jersey State Lottery Commission v. United States

Citations

  • 491 F.2d 219
  • 29 Rad. Reg. 2d (P & F) 157

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “It is significant that the rule provides a ‘reasonable opportunity’ rather than requiring that the presentation of materials be in accordance with Rule 56.”
  • “It is significant that the rule provides a ‘reasonable opportunity’ rather than requiring that the presentation of materials be in accordance with Rule 56.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Adams, Aldisert, Dusen, Garth, Gibbons, Hunter, Rosenn, Seitz, Weis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.