New Jersey Division of Youth & Family Services v. B.R.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that if an appellate court determines that the record generates a “genuine issue of fact” on a parent’s ineffectiveness claim raised in a direct appeal, the matter should be remanded for a hearing
• declining to adopt the fundamental fairness test because the court \see[s] little practical difference between the [ Geist II and Strickland ] standards\
• declining to adopt the fundamental fairness test because the coui’t “see[s] little practical difference between the [Geist II and Strickland] standards”
• applying standard adopted in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 694 (1984), and approved by our Supreme Court in State v. Fritz, 105 N.J. 42, 58 (1987)
• applying standard adopted in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 694 (1984), and approved by our Supreme Court in State v. Fritz, 105 N.J. 42, 58 (1987)
• adopting standard for ineffective representation set forth in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 694 (1984), and adopted in State v. Fritz, 105 N.J. 42, 58 (1987)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).