Skip to main content
· 7/30/1998

Federal Case

Citations

  • 152 F.3d 217
  • 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 17448

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • remanding because “the district court made insufficient factual finding for us to review its standing determination.”
  • rejecting state and federal constitutional challenges to ordinance that “prohibit[s] ownership of [rooming and boarding] houses by persons convicted of crimes of moral turpitude”
  • remanding to the district court for “further factual development and a new determination by the district court regarding plaintiffs’ standing” because of “insufficient factual findings for us to review its standing determination.”
  • remanding to the district court for \further factual development and a new determination by the district court regarding plaintiffs' standing” because of \insufficient factual findings for us to review its standing determination.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.