New Jersey Board of Public Utilities v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that state-mandated resources consisted of “any planned resource being developed in response to a state regulatory or legislative mandate to resolve a projected capacity shortfall”
• explaining that state-mandated resources consisted of “any planned resource being developed in response to a state regulatory or legislative mandate to resolve a projected capacity shortfall”
• explaining that the capacity market ensures that “there are enough . . . generators connected to the transmission grid for the system to function at peak load.”
• explaining that the capacity market ensures that “there are enough . . . generators connected to the transmission grid for the system to function at peak load.”
• explaining that the capacity market ensures that “there are enough . . . generators connected to the transmission grid for the system to function at peak load.”
• reviewing whether FERC’s elimination of a state-mandated exception was “in excess of statutory jurisdiction, authority, or limitations, or short of statutory right” (internal quotation marks omitted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).