New Haverford Partnership v. Stroot

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the standard of care may be defined by both common law principles and by statute
• observing that “[t]he phrase ‘common law’ negligence is sometimes used . . . to differentiate between ordinary negligence and negligence per se”
• “Before the Court is Defendants’ motion for remittitur and relief from the jury verdict, pursuant to Superior Court Civil Rule 59(d
• “Before the Court is Defendants’ motion for remittitur and relief from the jury verdict, pursuant to Superior Court Civil Rule 59(d
• affirming $1 million for asthma and sinus problems

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).