New Haven Tile & Floor Covering Co. v. Roman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• even though written agreement stated that terms could not “be varied by any verbal representation or promise,” parol evidence to show that agreement was not binding and valid was admissible
• where builder and homeowner stipulated that before they could establish any agreement, approval of third party who was to pay for the repairs must be obtained; there was no contract unless and until third party granted approval

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).