Supreme Court· 6/29/1970

New Haven Inclusion Cases

Citations

399 U.S. 392
90 S. Ct. 2054
26 L. Ed. 2d 691
1970 U.S. LEXIS 93

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that a party who “took no appeal” from an adverse order is “foreclosed by res judicata” from later seeking relief inconsistent with that order
holding that a party who \took no appeal\ from an adverse order is \foreclosed by res judicata \ from later seeking relief inconsistent with that order
finding a party's request for the return of certain stock precluded by res judicata where the party had failed to make a timely appeal of the initial decision transferring ownership to another party
noting that security holders \invested their capital in a public utility that does owe an obligation to the public [and thereby] assumed the risk that in any depression or any reorganization the interests of the public would be considered as well as theirs\
finding a party’s request for the return of certain stock precluded by res judicata where the party had failed to make a timely appeal of the initial decision transferring ownership to another party
“[I]t is a fundamental aspect of our free enterprise economy that private persons assume the risks attached to their investments.” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Black, Blackmun, Douglas, Harlan, Marshall, Stewart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

129 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

78 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.