New Hampshire Right to Life v. United States Department of Health & Human Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that material was appropriately redacted and/or withheld pursuant to recognized exemptions to the Freedom of Information Act, not discovery obligations
• explaining that “[m]ere reliance on a document’s conclusions . . . does not necessarily involve reliance on a document’s analysis; both will ordinarily be needed before a court may properly find adoption or incorporation by reference” (quotations omitted)
• explaining that “[m]ere reliance on a document’s conclusions . . . does not necessarily involve reliance on a document’s analysis; both will ordinarily be needed before a court may properly find adoption or incorporation by reference” (quotations omitted)
• finding that documents in which an agency considered how to make a “public announcement” of a grant award “deal with the Department’s decision of how and what to communicate with the public, which is a decision in and of itself”
• protecting documents that “deal with the Department’s decision of how and what to communicate to the public, which is a decision in and of itself”
• quotingChurch of Scientology Int’l v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice, 30 F.3d 224, 228 (1st Cir. 1994)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).