New Hampshire Right to Life Political Action Committee v. Gardner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that plaintiff had “standing to mount a pre-enforcement facial challenge to the statutory cap.”
• holding that the threat to enforce an arguably unconstitutional statute may give rise to standing to challenge that statute - an issue not relevant in this proceeding
• concluding that the $1,000 limit imposed on independent expenditures by political committees by RSA 664:5 V \severely restricts political speech\ and holding that \the First Amendment does not tolerate such drastic limitations of protected political advocacy.\
• determining that political action committee had standing to challenge New Hampshire campaign finance limits even though New Hampshire's Attorney General had informed plaintiff that the state would not enforce the law
• finding justiciable claim despite defendant’s assurance that statute did not prohibit plaintiffs’ activity because “when dealing with pre-enforcement challenges to recently enacted (or, at least, non-moribund
• applying those criteria to conclude that the dispute satisfied prudential prerequisites for a grant of standing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).