New Hampshire Insurance v. C'Est Moi, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that insured’s confusion between a quote request form’s inquiry about the “previous insurer” and an insurance application’s inquiry about the “present insurer” could “show that [the insured’s] misrepresentation wasn’t intentional”
• “The fact that the insurer has demanded answers to specific questions in an application for insurance is in itself usually sufficient to establish materiality as a matter of law.” (quotation marks omitted)
• “Uberrimae fidei is a longstanding federal maritime doctrine that applies to marine insurance contracts.”
• first quoting, Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London v. Inlet Fisheries Inc., 518 F.3d 645, 648 (9th Cir. 2008); and then quoting Cigna Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co. v. Polaris Pictures Corp., 159 F.3d 412, 420 (9th Cir. 1998)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).