New England Regional Council of Carpenters v. Thomas J. Kinton, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \it would be pointless either to enjoin the enforcement of a regulation that is no longer in effect or to declare its constitutional status\
• remarking that it would be “pointless” to declare the constitutionality of a policy that had been revised during litigation
• noting that \it would be pointless . . . to declare [the] constitutional status\ of a restriction \that is no longer in effect\
• remarking that it would be “pointless” to declare the constitutionality of a policy that had been revised during litigation
• “Interpreting the FAA to dispense with the jurisdictional requirements 19 of Due Process in actions to confirm arbitral awards would raise clear questions concerning the 20 constitutionality of the statutes”
• applying Buckhannon to the Civil Rights Attorneys’ Fees Awards Act of 1976

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).