Skip to main content
· 2/25/2009

New England Insurance v. Barnett

Citations

  • 561 F.3d 392
  • 66 A.L.R. Fed. 2d 773
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 3876
  • 2009 WL 456406

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that, in determining the nature of an action for purposes of claim comparison, a counterclaim should be considered
  • considering counterclaim for coercive relief in determining whether Colorado River applies
  • “‘When an action contains any claim for coercive relief, the Colorado River abstention doctrine is ordinarily applicable.’”
  • discussing the difference between the Brillhart and Colorado River doctrines

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wiener, Garza, Demoss

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.