· 2/25/2009
New England Insurance v. Barnett
Citations
- 561 F.3d 392
- 66 A.L.R. Fed. 2d 773
- 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 3876
- 2009 WL 456406
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that, in determining the nature of an action for purposes of claim comparison, a counterclaim should be considered
- considering counterclaim for coercive relief in determining whether Colorado River applies
- “‘When an action contains any claim for coercive relief, the Colorado River abstention doctrine is ordinarily applicable.’”
- discussing the difference between the Brillhart and Colorado River doctrines
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wiener, Garza, Demoss
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.