Skip to main content
· 7/10/2002

New Comm Wireless v. SprintCom, Inc.

Citations

  • 213 F. Supp. 2d 61
  • 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13124
  • 2002 WL 1610903

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that roaming service agreement does not constitute sufficient contact for general jurisdiction
  • finding defendants could foresee being sued in Puerto Rico where Roaming Service 2 Plaintiff’s reference to Metan Marine’s profile on Better Business Bureau is irrelevant to the Court’s analysis (d.e. 11, p. 9

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gelpi

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.