· 7/10/2002
New Comm Wireless v. SprintCom, Inc.
Citations
- 213 F. Supp. 2d 61
- 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13124
- 2002 WL 1610903
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that roaming service agreement does not constitute sufficient contact for general jurisdiction
- finding defendants could foresee being sued in Puerto Rico where Roaming Service 2 Plaintiff’s reference to Metan Marine’s profile on Better Business Bureau is irrelevant to the Court’s analysis (d.e. 11, p. 9
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gelpi
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.