Skip to main content
· 1/25/2002

New Atlanta Ear, Nose & Throat Associates v. Pratt

Citations

  • 560 S.E.2d 268
  • 253 Ga. App. 681
  • 18 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 408
  • 2002 Fulton County D. Rep. 379
  • 2002 Ga. App. LEXIS 104

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • regardless of level of scrutiny, lack of a territorial restriction renders covenant unenforceable
  • court cannot use blue pencil method to “rewrite a contract void for vagueness”
  • a court may “blue pencil” to “limit an area, thus making it reasonable”
  • court cannot use blue pencil method to “rewrite a contract void for vagueness”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Miller, Andrews, Eldridge

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.