New Amsterdam Casualty Company v. Jordan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying a new trial when new evidence did not “bring to light a new and independent truth”
• holding that trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying a new trial when new evidence did not A bring to light a new and independent truth @
• noting that “public policy, looking to the finality of trials, requires that parties be held to diligence in preparing their cases, and that they shall not be allowed a second trial because they mistook the amount of testimony requisite.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).