New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Estes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that suits by state’s residents are “subject to the considerations of policy underlying the doctrine of forum non conveniens” and are not “shield[ed] ... from the operation of that doctrine”
• observing that suits by state’s residents are “subject to the considerations of policy underlying the doctrine of forum non conveniens” and are not “shield[ed] . . . from the operation of that doctrine”
• factors to consider include administrative burdens caused by litigation that has its origins elsewhere and desirability of trial in forum that is at home with governing law
• discussing factors for determining whether dismissal is appropriate
• discussing the common-law principals of forum non conveniens

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).