Skip to main content
· 1/25/2016

New Alliance Bank v. Tanasi

Citations

  • 136 S. Ct. 979
  • 194 L. Ed. 2d 3
  • 84 U.S.L.W. 3415
  • 2016 U.S. LEXIS 894

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the plaintiff could not “use this court’s diversity jurisdiction to execute an end-run around a final state court judgment.”
  • “Because Rooker–Feldman concerns federal subject matter jurisdiction, this court may raise the issue sua sponte at any time.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.