Skip to main content
· 6/21/2011

New Albany Tractor, Inc. v. Louisville Tractor, Inc.

Citations

  • 650 F.3d 1046
  • 79 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1362
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 12457
  • 2011 WL 2448909

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that, after Iqbal, plaintiffs cannot use the discovery process to obtain facts necessary to state a claim
  • ‘[ W]e may not accept conclusory legal allegations that do not include specific facts necessary to establish the cause of action.” (quotation marks omitted)
  • “[C]ourts may no longer accept conclusory allegations that do not include specific facts necessary to establish the cause of action” and “plaintiff[s] may not use the discovery process to obtain [specific] facts after filing suit.”
  • “[C]ourts may no longer accept conclusory allegations that do not include specific facts necessary to establish the cause of action” and “plaintiff[s] may not use the discovery process to obtain [] facts after filing suit.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Merritt, Clay, Griffin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.