Skip to main content
· 12/10/1858

New Albany & Salem Railroad v. Haskell

Citations

  • 11 Ind. 301

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that judicial estoppel did not apply where the allegedly inconsistent position was not considered by the prior court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davison

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.