Nevius v. Africa Inland Mission International

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that, in light of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(d), “[t]he court is not persuaded . . . that [Plaintiff] cannot allege an express contract while asserting a claim for unjust enrichment, a remedy designed for the absence of a contract”
• dismissing defamation claim filed nearly seven months after statute of limitations had run

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).