Nevin v. Carlasco

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting narrow circumstances independently giving rise to the common law tavern-keeper duty of reasonable care to protect patrons from obstreperous or violent fellow patrons but affirming nonsuit of third-party dram shop claim based on lack of “proximate cause”
• inter alia noting that “[t]here was no evidence adduced” that tavern personnel “had served” the primary tortfeasor “any intoxicating liquor” or that he was intoxicated despite “that he had a glass partially filled with an amber fluid and ice [on the bar] in front of him”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).