Nevin v. Board of Professional Responsibility of the Supreme Court

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding six-month suspension when attorney misappropriated client funds and finding ABA Standard 4.12 and 4.42 to be applicable
• affirming six-month suspension of attorney who mishandled client funds but blamed others for his actions and was unremorseful
• “[T]here is no requirement that an attorney’s actions be criminal before a suspension may be imposed.” (citing Sneed v. Bd. of Pro. Resp., 37 S.W.3d 886, 891 (Tenn. 2000))
• “repeated misconduct” warrants harsher discipline

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).