Skip to main content
· 10/28/2005

Nevers v. State, Department of Administration, Division of Motor Vehicles

Citations

  • 123 P.3d 958
  • 2005 Alas. LEXIS 149
  • 2005 WL 2812747

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the exclusionary rule does not apply to license revocation hearings as a general rule
  • holding that the exclusionary rule does not apply to license revocation hearings as a general rule
  • concluding exclusionary rule not applicable to license suspension proceeding because benefits of applying rule are marginal and costs would be substantial
  • exclusionary rule for unlawful search or seizure does not apply in administrative driver's license revocation hearing
  • “[W]e join the majority of jurisdictions and hold that the exclusionary rule is inapplicable to search and seizure violations in administrative license revocation hearings.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bryner, Eastaugh, Fabe, Carpeneti, Matthews

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.