Skip to main content
· 11/4/2004

Nevel v. State

Citations

  • 818 N.E.2d 1
  • 2004 WL 2473487

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that statements of counsel are not evidence
  • wherein a panel of this Court observed that it was improper for the prosecutor to comment that the defendant’s argument was a smoke screen and a tactic used by defense counsel to distort facts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Darden, Baker, Friedlander

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.