· 11/5/1964
Nevada Transit Co. v. Harris Brothers Lumber Co.
Citations
- 396 P.2d 133
- 80 Nev. 465
- 1964 Nev. LEXIS 192
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that a motion for a change of venue does not meet the requirement that a written demand for a change of venue be filed
- explaining that a motion for a change of venue does not meet the requirement that a written demand for a change of venue be filed
- explaining that a motion for a change of venue does not meet the 1Pursuant to NRAP 34(f)(1), we have determined that oral argument is not warranted in this appeal. • aria requirement that a written demand for a change of venue be filed
- motion brought pursuant to NRS 13.050(2)(c) considered even though no timely demand made
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McNamee, Badt, Thompson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.