Skip to main content
· 11/5/1964

Nevada Transit Co. v. Harris Brothers Lumber Co.

Citations

  • 396 P.2d 133
  • 80 Nev. 465
  • 1964 Nev. LEXIS 192

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that a motion for a change of venue does not meet the requirement that a written demand for a change of venue be filed
  • explaining that a motion for a change of venue does not meet the requirement that a written demand for a change of venue be filed
  • explaining that a motion for a change of venue does not meet the 1Pursuant to NRAP 34(f)(1), we have determined that oral argument is not warranted in this appeal. • aria requirement that a written demand for a change of venue be filed
  • motion brought pursuant to NRS 13.050(2)(c) considered even though no timely demand made

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McNamee, Badt, Thompson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.