· 1/10/1969
Nevada State Bank v. Snowden
Citations
- 449 P.2d 254
- 85 Nev. 19
- 1969 Nev. LEXIS 470
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- considering the parol evidence rule and stating, “we are not convinced that absent a proper objection at trial, where the point is specifically called to the attention of the trial court for ruling, the error can be raised for the first time on appeal”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Collins, Zenoff, Thompson, Gezelin, Wilkes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.