Skip to main content
· 1/10/1969

Nevada State Bank v. Snowden

Citations

  • 449 P.2d 254
  • 85 Nev. 19
  • 1969 Nev. LEXIS 470

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • considering the parol evidence rule and stating, “we are not convinced that absent a proper objection at trial, where the point is specifically called to the attention of the trial court for ruling, the error can be raised for the first time on appeal”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Collins, Zenoff, Thompson, Gezelin, Wilkes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.