Nevada Land Action Association, and National Wildlife Federation, Intervenor v. United States Forest Service

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that assertions of \'lifestyle loss' as well as economic loss\ were inadequate to establish prudential standing because the actions sought by the plaintiff would not benefit the environment
• finding that the plaintiffs: could not seek relief that would promote their economic interests if doing so would damage the environment
• \[A] plaintiff who asserts purely economic injuries does not have standing to challenge an agency action under NEPA.\
• “The purpose of NEPA is to protect the envi- ronment, not the economic interests of those adversely affected by agency decisions.”
• “[A] plaintiff who asserts purely 'economic injuries does not have standing to challenge an agency action under NEPA.”
• “The purpose of NEPA is to protect the environment, not the economic interests of those adversely affected by agency decisions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).