Neustar, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding, in a child-pornography-possession case, that a declaration written by the victim’s attorney describing her losses was sufficient to meet the government’s burden
• rejecting an argument that the Government failed to satisfy its burden under § 2259 where the vic- tims did not submit “psychological or economic reports detailing their losses” but relied solely on a declaration written by their coun- sel describing their losses
• treating expert reports as permissible costs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).