Neurorepair, Inc. v. Nath Law Group

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff could prevail on breach of contract “cause[] of action under alternate bases that do not necessarily implicate an issue of substantive patent law”
• holding that “vague assertions, which do not contain citations to authority, do not convincingly establish” that government has “direct interest” in outcome of dispute “between private parties” related to state claims
• finding a federal issue not “necessarily raised” where a plaintiff can prevail on the federal issue or on a non-federal issue
• “A plaintiff’s right to relief for a given claim necessarily depends on a question of federal law only when every legal theory supporting the claim requires the resolution of a federal issue.” (quoting Dixon v. Coburg Dairy, Inc., 369 F.3d 811, 816 (4th Cir. 2004) (en banc)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).