Neumann v. Liles

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• comparing the amount of attorney fees to the amount of claim in case
• defendant’s act of publishing such an opin- ion online qualified as “conduct in furtherance of * * * the constitutional right of free speech” for purposes of ORS 31.150(2)(d), because the right to post an “opinion of that nature” is part of the “First Amendment right to free speech”
• defendant’s act of publishing such an opinion online qualified as “conduct in furtherance of * * * the consti- tutional right of free speech” for purposes of ORS 31.150(2)(d), because the right to post an “opinion of that nature” is part of the “First Amendment right to free speech”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Davoodian v. Rivera
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-07-26· cited 20×
• DeHart v. Tofte
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-07-06· cited 9×
• Mouktabis v. Clackamas County Assessor
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-09-07· cited 9×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & Industries
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1993-10-19· cited 2,400×
• State v. Gaines
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2009-04-30· cited 1,741×
• Unelko Corp., an Illinois Corporation Howard G. Ohlhausen v. Andy Rooney, an Individual Cbs, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 1990-08-24· cited 140×
• Neumann v. Liles
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2016-03-03· cited 64×
• Neumann v. Liles
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-03-12· cited 15×
• Steele v. a & B Automotive & Towing Service, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-07-26· cited 9×