Skip to main content
· 12/10/1910

Neuling v. Brown

Citations

  • 83 Kan. 625
  • 112 P. 110
  • 1910 Kan. LEXIS 595

Syllabus

<p>1. School Land — Forfeiture — Estoppel. Where proceedings were taken to forfeit a contract of purchase of school land the subsequent conduct of the holder of the original certicate es-topped him from asserting his claims as against a second purchaser.</p> <p>2. Evidence — Burden of Proof and Presumptions — Forfeiture— School Land. Testimony held insufficient to overcome the presumption raised by the statute making certain facts prima fade evidence of a valid forfeiture of a school-land contract.</p>

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.