Neufville v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a court should only reach the second prong of the Strickland test when it has determined that the attorney's representation was deficient
• concluding that a court should only reach the second prong of the Strickland test when it has determined that the attorney’s representation was deficient
• commenting on the effect of a shorter sentence on the prejudice prong in a ease where an evidentiary hearing was held and findings of fact were made
• commenting on the effect of a shorter sentence on the prejudice prong in a case where an evidentiary hearing was held and findings of fact were made
• “Counsel is not required to inform their clients that they will be deported, but rather that a defendant’s ‘plea would make [the defendant] eligible for deportation.’” (quoting Padilla, 559 U.S. at 368)
• “Counsel is not required to inform their clients that they will be deported, but rather that a defendant’s ‘plea would make [the defendant] eligible for deportation.’” (quoting Padilla, 559 U.S. at 368)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).