Neuchatel Swiss General Insurance Company, and Express Transports S.A. v. Lufthansa Airlines Deutsche Lufthansa A.G.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying stay despite parallel British action where parties were not substantially the same and other Colorado River factors were absent
• “Even if the litigants had made somewhat more progress in Geneva than in the district court by the time the stay motion was heard, the mere fact that parallel proceedings may be further along does not make a case exceptional.”
• stay vacated where \unexceptional commercial dispute\
• stay vacated where “unexceptional commercial dispute”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).