Neu v. McKechnie

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the chancellor erred by concluding that “large numbers of pickets” blocking two entrances of employer’s plant for fifteen minutes each morning and a half hour each evening was not a seizure within the meaning of section 206d(d
• holding that the chancellor erred by concluding that “large numbers of pickets” blocking two entrances of employer’s plant for fifteen minutes each morning and a half hour each evening was not a seizure within the meaning of section 206d(d
• five or six picketers in front of entrance constituted a seizure
• Applies the “clearly erroneous” standard of appellate review.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).