Nettleton's Exor. v. City of Louisville

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that Rule 11 should be judged on objective unreasonableness to prevent chilling effects on creative advocacy
• rejecting defendants’ claim of fraudulent joinder where they argued they were entitled to immunity from plaintiff’s suit
• denying request for costs and fees associated with removal “[g]iven the lack of controlling authority regarding removal” based on a federal statute
• describing fraudulent joinder as applying “when it is objectively reasonable to infer that the plaintiff has engaged in a form of litigation abuse”
• describing fraudulent joinder as applying “when it is objectively reasonable to infer that the plaintiff has engaged in a form of litigation abuse”
• describing fraudulent joinder as applying “when it is objectively reasonable to infer that the plaintiff has engaged in a form of litigation abuse”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).