Supreme Court of Alabama· 7/13/1972
Nettles v. Bishop
Citations
- 266 So. 2d 260
- 289 Ala. 100
- 1972 Ala. LEXIS 1027
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- agreeing that the settled rule is that the report of an investigating officer is not admissible as it is hearsay
- noting the apparent general rule that “the report of an investigating officer is not admissible in evidence as being hearsay”
- noting the apparent general rule that 'the report of an investigating officer is not admissible in evidence as being hearsay'
- noting that police reports are hearsay
- nothing that police reports are hearsay
- error to admit trooper's accident report after reconstruction expert testified that in forming his opinion he considered facts therein
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Harwood, Bloodworth, McCall, Heflin, Coleman, Har-Wood
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- James v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1998-05-08· cited 46×
- W. T. Ratliff Company, Inc. v. PurvisSupreme Court of Alabama· 1974-02-14· cited 31×
- Gentry v. GilmoreSupreme Court of Alabama· 1993-01-29· cited 26×
- Shanklin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2014-12-19· cited 22×
- Harrison v. Woodley Square Apartments, Ltd.Supreme Court of Alabama· 1982-09-24· cited 18×
- Reeves v. KingSupreme Court of Alabama· 1988-09-30· cited 13×
- Dennis v. ScarboroughSupreme Court of Alabama· 1978-04-28· cited 13×
- Big Three Motors, Inc. v. RutherfordSupreme Court of Alabama· 1983-05-20· cited 12×
- MacK v. Carmack, 1091040 (Ala. 9-9-2011)Supreme Court of Alabama· 2011-09-09· cited 12×
- Dubray v. South Dakota Department of Social ServicesSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2004-12-15· cited 11×
- Erwin v. SandersSupreme Court of Alabama· 1975-10-02· cited 11×
- Armstead v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama· 1983-04-22· cited 9×
- Mainor v. Hayneville Telephone Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1997-12-19· cited 8×
- Mattingly v. CummingsSupreme Court of Alabama· 1980-10-03· cited 7×
- Worsham v. FletcherSupreme Court of Alabama· 1984-07-13· cited 6×
- Leonard v. CunninghamCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2008-09-26· cited 6×
- Anonymous v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1986-08-12· cited 5×
- Williams v. TylerSupreme Court of Alabama· 1976-10-01· cited 5×
- Crusoe v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama· 2015-02-20· cited 4×
- Gardner v. WilliamsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1980-09-24· cited 4×
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Vest v. GaySupreme Court of Alabama· 1963-05-30· cited 76×
- Shirley v. ShirleySupreme Court of Alabama· 1954-02-25· cited 65×
- Thompson v. Magic City Trucking ServiceSupreme Court of Alabama· 1963-05-30· cited 38×
- HARVEY REGLAND COMPANY v. NewtonSupreme Court of Alabama· 1958-08-28· cited 33×
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama· 1963-02-28· cited 30×
- Western Railway of Alabama v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama· 1967-02-23· cited 15×
- Godwin v. JerkinsSupreme Court of Alabama· 1968-03-07· cited 13×
- Coe v. Louisville and Nashville Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Alabama· 1961-05-11· cited 10×
- Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama· 1951-06-14· cited 9×
- Peoples Tel. Co. v. BuchanonAlabama Court of Appeals· 1953-12-01· cited 7×
- Smith v. PierceSupreme Court of Alabama· 1961-11-02· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.