Netso & Bohlen v. Foss & Schneider
Citations
- 21 Fla. 143
Syllabus
<p>.1. When there is a judgment of default against one joint promissor and an issue of fact joined as to another, it is proper practice to submit to a jury the issues of fact as to the defendant who pleads and the assessment of damages as against the one who makes default. The statute authorizing the clerk to assess damages upon default does not apply to this case.</p> <p>A The rule that there can be but one judgment against joint promissors within the same jurisdiction, refers to final judgment and not to a default for not pleading entered against one.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that in the absence of any constitutional or statutory reasonable expectation of privacy, a defendant has no standing to complain of defects in the grand jury subpoena process
- Johnson, J, dissenting to the dismissal of the petition for discretionary review
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.