Nestle USA v. WCAB (Gallen)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the plaintiffs’ testimony that their use of the easement was done without permission being explicitly sought or received was sufficient to maintain the presumption of adversity afforded to easements used continuously for the prescriptive period
• finding the trial court’s injunction preserved the status quo by allowing access to a route used up until the defendant blocked it with a gate

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).