Nestle Food Co. v. Miller

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reiterating the \enduring rule that damages must be established by a reasonable certainty and may not be recovered if purely speculative\
• granting injunctive relief on the basis of a modified non-competition agreement and awarding nominal damages for conduct occurring prior to modification
• reiterating the “enduring rule that damages must be established by a reasonable certainty and may not be recovered if purely speculative”
• prohibiting former salesman from revealing or using confidential information or soliciting his former customers for one year was sufficient to protect employer’s interests
• \[Plaintiff] surely has a right to prohibit the use of its `confidential information' for the benefit of another company. . . .\
• court may modify and enforce an agreement as reasonably necessary to protect legitimate interests

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).