Ness v. Stewart

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that evi- dence that the defendant was under the influence of meth- amphetamine did not give rise to a reasonable inference that the defendant possessed methamphetamine paraphernalia that retained methamphetamine residue
• describing stacking of inferences as relying on logical “bridge[s] never built”
• “If the premises collectively are impermissibly speculative, or if any of the premises is individually insupportable, the stop was not supported by reasonable suspicion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).