Nesmith v. Nesmith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Awarding parties an undivided one-half interest in property can lead to “mismanagement of the property not to mention the many possibilities for added friction between two individuals.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Baum v. Baum
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1978-07-20· cited 32×
• Ramsay v. WHEELER-RAMSAY
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2010-05-20

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Spector v. Spector
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1963-06-05· cited 43×
• Becchelli v. Becchelli
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1973-03-22· cited 40×
• Kennedy v. Kennedy
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1963-03-27· cited 39×
• Wick v. Wick
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1971-09-30· cited 30×
• Andrade v. Andrade
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1912-12-23· cited 23×
• Leeker v. Leeker
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1921-12-10· cited 23×
• Spector v. Spector
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1972-05-04· cited 22×
• Jizmejian v. Jizmejian
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1972-01-27· cited 18×
• Frankel v. Frankel
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1933-01-30· cited 4×
• Ellis v. Ellis
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1928-01-09· cited 4×