Neske v. City of St. Louis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[generally the use of the word ‘shall’ connotes a mandatory duty”
• the court may look to the established policy as disclosed by a “general course of legislation”
• overruled on other grounds by King-Willmann v. Webster Groves Sch. Dist., 361 S.W.3d 414, 417 n. 4 (Mo. banc 2012)
• overruled, on other grounds by King-Willmann v. Webster Groves Sch. Disk, 361 S.W.3d 414 (Mo. banc 2012)
• overruled on other grounds by King-Willmann v. Webster Groves Sch. Dist., 361 S.W.3d 414 (Mo. banc 2012)
• the court may look to the established policy as disclosed by a \general course of legislation\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).