Skip to main content
· 12/4/1981

Nero v. Ferris

Citations

  • 284 S.E.2d 828
  • 222 Va. 807
  • 1981 Va. LEXIS 377

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “While privity generally involves a party so identical in interest with another that he represents the same legal, right, a determination of just who are privies requires a careful examination into the circumstances of each case.”
  • “In other words, to support the jurisdictional grounds claimed, the plaintiff would have been required to prove that William as agent operated Noah’s vehicle in California. ... Hence, we apply collateral estoppel here on the narrow basis of privity.”
  • privity defined in terms of identity of interests

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Compton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.