Neptune Orient Lines, Ltd.,plaintiff-Appellee v. Burlington Northern and Santafe Railway Company,opinion

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting defendant’s argument that actual loss was limited to the amount that plaintiff paid to its manufacturer to obtain the goods where goods were not replaceable
• “The language of [Carmack] also encompasses the inland leg of an overseas shipment conducted under a single ‘through’ bill of lading ....”
• ‘‘Replacement cost is an appropriate measure of damages where the injured party could mitigate the loss by replacing the goods.”
• “Replacement cost is an appropriate measure of damages where¡ the injured party could mitigate the loss by replacing the goods.”
• “The language of [Carmack] also encompasses the inland leg of an overseas shipment conducted under a single ‘through’ bill of lading . . . .”
• “The language of [Carmack] also encompasses the inland leg of an overseas shipment conducted under a single ‘through’ bill of lading . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).