Neptali Armando Orellana v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that even if question of whether defendant could request blood testing was improper burden shifting, its prejudicial effect was slight
• “A motion for instructed verdict is essentially a trial level challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence.”
• blood stain in appellant’s vehicle matched victim, establishing principal responsibility

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).